Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

HBO’s Veep Gets Religion

The Julia Louis-Dreyfus series takes a religious approach to comedy, which makes it both funny and profound

Print Email
(Bill Gray/HBO)

You know that HBO show everyone’s talking about? The one about the young woman who is a little bit lost, struggling to land her dream job, and swatting her way through a predatory big city that is stifling and dominated by men?

Veep, in which Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays a second-in-command whose capacity for speaking out of turn rivals only that of the real-life second-in-command, is the cable giant’s funniest show in years. The character’s catch phrase is “did the president call?”—a line that Louis-Dreyfus delivers with more bathos and anguish than Lena Dunham’s characters on that other HBO show, Girls, could ever conjure. Whereas Girls allows its women to roam aimlessly through Brooklyn, Veep forces its woman to crawl through the corridors of power. If Seinfeld, which made Louis-Dreyfus famous, was a show about nothing, Veep is a show about many things, all of them niggling but essential. And in paying ample attention to the small details behind big government, it captures something fundamental about human behavior—something true not only of politics but also of faith.

Consider, for example, the main story arc of the first season, which concludes this Sunday. The Veep, Selina Meyer, is trying to pass a clean jobs bill, a task that requires the consent of environmentalists and big oil alike and that rests on the artful stroking of gargantuan egos. Episode after episode is spent with Meyer and her crew devising new ways of practicing the art of the possible. When a combative senator threatens to pull his support if an oil industry executive finds his way onto the initiative’s advisory committee—the latter being an explicit demand of the oil-industry-friendly president—Meyer’s team approaches a former oil executive, a semantic nuance they manage to parade around as a substantive difference.

Most writers who choose to take on the political system as their theme (see under: Sorkin, Aaron) reflexively lean on pomp, reminding us, in well-crafted dialogues, that underneath all the din and the rancor are idealistic and intelligent men and women with soft hearts and lofty goals. But Veep’s creator, Armando Iannucci, is made of sterner stuff; the only inspirational words he allows his characters have four letters. Meyer and her staff curse like Gregorian monks chant, a way of communicating clearly directed at attracting the attention of some higher power.

The religious metaphor isn’t accidental. Before finding his way into comedy, Iannucci, who was born in Glasgow, considered becoming a Catholic priest. He exchanged one ancient order for another and began his doctoral studies at Oxford, writing about Paradise Lost and 17th-century religious language. His education shines through in each scene of his show: Rather than perceive of the Old Executive Office Building as a stage on which to play out large, universal themes, he concentrates on the machinations of power, which are sometimes senseless and often constricting and never too far from incredible.

This insight makes for not only good comedy, but also good religion. The difference between the spiritual person and the religious one is that the latter understands that the former’s good will is inconsequential unless governed by rules. To declare oneself spiritual is akin to declaring oneself a big fan of cheddar: It feels good to say, but it means nothing. If you’re really serious, you ask questions, and if you ask questions, you realize that the greatest one of them all—whether or not there is a God—is unanswerable. And then you have two choices: You either succumb to nihilism or despair, or you make up a set of rules to live by. If you’re theologically minded, these rules assume the existence of a Creator and govern the ways of interacting with the divine. If you’re civic minded, these rules assume the existence of a people and govern the ways of interacting with fellow human beings. Whatever the core belief, without the rules it’s just a fleeting idea.

Serious theologians know that. And serious comedy writers do, too. That’s the reason why shows like Everybody Loves Raymond are so forgettable—they’re like layer-cakes of generalizations—and shows like Veep or Curb Your Enthusiasm are so brilliant; they jam their characters into an airtight fictional world and force them to remain faithful to a codex governing every aspect of their social behavior. Whether it’s an Orthodox Jew keeping six hours between meat and milk or Larry David keeping the number of samples you can have at the frozen yogurt store to two, writing up laws and obeying them is how you keep the faith, and the laughs, alive.

And writing laws is the Veep’s métier. In just eight episodes, the show’s first season built up a universe that is claustrophobic and delightfully absurd. There’s no walking-and-talking here; instead, viewers are prompted to feel the same unease that Meyer and her staff members feel, and like them care less about education, the environment, and the economy and more about vote tallies, filibusters, and remembering the name of that guy from that lobby who might be useful in promoting a future policy initiative.

Later this month, as Veep goes on its summer hiatus, it’ll be replaced by Sorkin’s The Newsroom, which, judging by its trailer, looks just as mawkish as any of his other shows. Here’s hoping that come fall, Vice President Meyer will return, hiss out a few choice words, and launch right in to the minutia—the small things, the things that irritate us but that we have to do anyway, the things, in other words, that take up so much of life for so many of us. This, one suspects, is probably why the fifth commandment orders us to respect our parents rather than, say, love them. Love is ephemeral. Respect is an action plan. It was true in Sinai, and it’s true in D.C. as well.

***

Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

Print Email
Jojo Lolo says:


The one about the young woman who is a little bit lost, struggling to land her dream job, and swatting her way through a predatory big city that is stifling and dominated by men?”

Daenaris in Game of Thrones ?

corey949 says:

Obviously. Valor morghulis, bro.

leahsss says:

The four letter words that abound in Veep exemplify the paucity of verbal expression in most American TV shows. What the f*ck, can’t you guys formulate a normal sentence anymore?

ljhomes says:

Everybody Loves Raymond forgettable?  I guess that’s why it was on network  TV for multiple seasons and why my Israeli daughter-in-law refers to our same street living arrangement as “just like the Raymond show.”  Perhaps you should curb your enthusiasm about this new one until it has some seasoning of its own.

You really want people on TV saying things like “exemplify the paucity of verbal expression”? E.B. White thinks your second sentence is way better.

gwhepner says:

RULES ARE FOR THOSE WHO’RE RELIGIOUS, NOT FOR THOSE WHO’RE SPIRITUAL

 

Rules are only needed
by those who’re religious, not

for those who’re
spiritual, for whom they seem to be redundant.

Because the good Lord
gave so many to the Jews, it’s what

they love to focus on.
In fact the rules are so abundant

few realize their
sources in the Torah and the mishnah

are very spiritual, so
many looking for this flavor

will join cults like Kabbalah Center or the Hari Krishna

to do, so they believe,
their soulful spirit a great favor.

Abandoning the rules
that with great spirit are imbued,

but by free-spirits are
ignored before they’re cast aside.

these people in their
fruitless quest for spirit all delude

themselves by seeking
spurious sparks where none in fact reside.

 
gwhepner@yahoo.com

leahsss says:

I cna’t imagine Charlotte or Wilbur using all those expletives.

leahsss says:

But, seriously, the words we choose to express ourselves also color the way we view the world and our thoughts. The F word in American has become a noun, an adjective, an adverb… If you remove all the decelensions of f*ck from, for instance, Veep or The Wire you would only be left with about 15 minutes of dialogue! But it is certainly a useful word to keep everyone at arm’s length. You never have to truly describe an object or emotion or really reveal yourself.

 I think the writer meant that specific incidents in ELR are forgettable, not that the show itself is. And I tend to agree.

Oudtshoorn says:

Everybody Loves Raymond is not forgettable.   It was, and remains, a long-remembered and talked-about delight.   Particularly because almost every family can relate to it.

Disparishun says:

This piece is quite imaginative — one has the impression that the author wanted to write about his views on religion; likes, separately, the Veep show; and has come up with a piece that manages to yank the latter kicking and screaming into the service as the former (as he would put it).

elixelx says:

Unbelievable cotton wool pulled by a hack over half-blind eyes…
In a article supposed to reveal the religious background, the hilarity and the profundity…NOT A SINGLE EXAMPLE of divinity, humour or depth…NOT A SINGLE ONE!
Lord, why are you so STRICT with no-talent hacks?

ljhomes says:

 

Ah, yes…the true Wilbur, as in Mr Ed.  The horse had more snap in his verbiage than his Wonder Bread owner.   Semper Equininity!

” If Seinfeld, which made Louis-Dreyfus famous, was a show about nothing”  Exactly. Shows about nothing are one million times more successful. I don’t think Ms. Dreyfus would be ever remembered for Veep. 

leahsss says:

Wilbur the pig – a gentle and well spoken creature

The article and those sending their ideas show much ignorance when talking about Jewish Law and where real importance lays. There are Jews who keep 6 hours between meat and milk and those who keep one hour.but both keep barely a half hour between milk to meat. These are more in the realm of custom based on not eat or more correctly cooking the meat of a kid in its mothers milk. This may not have a dietary basis at all but more a moral basis. In any case these are more so on the side laws as comparing the Sabbath. He who did not keep the Sabbath was liable of a death penalty. where there was practically no penalty for dietary laws or if so just minor. The true Judaism is the basis of Sabbath. The real common denominator between the rich and the poor the owner and the slave the Jew and the gentile the human and the animal. The basis of Judaism is found in the Ten  Commajndments. You do not have all te laws and rfestivals there but you have a fair representation that a Jew in the false exile can live by. I say false today as opposed to thirty years ago any Jew could come to Israel if he chooses to do so.

ZenMonkey says:

Dang. Atheist-bashing in a review of my favorite sitcom? Unexpected.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

HBO’s Veep Gets Religion

The Julia Louis-Dreyfus series takes a religious approach to comedy, which makes it both funny and profound

More on Tablet:

Naomi Klein Wants To Save the Environment and Overthrow Capitalism All in One Book

By Heather Rogers — ‘This Changes Everything’ is great, except for the parts that don’t add up