Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Haredi Women’s Lit Explodes

The writers and editors behind the astonishing rise of Orthodox magazines and fiction

Print Email
(Photoillustration Tablet Magazine; original photos Matthew C. Wright/Flickr and Afton Almaraz/Getty Images.)
Related Content

Hasidic Writers, Plugged In

For some ultra-Orthodox writers, the tension between obedience and skepticism in their community fuels a unique art

Frum Female Underground Films

A spate of Orthodox women are turning to filmmaking (some restrictions apply)

But some suggest other factors. Shoshana Lepon, a 55-year-old children’s author and anthologist in the religious Jerusalem neighborhood of Ramat Beit Shemesh who calls herself an “open-minded Charedi,” attributes women’s achievements in the publishing world to a lack of other acceptable artistic outlets. “We’re not going to act, not going to do drama, not going to sing,” she explained. “Writing is one of the kosher arts.”

Though writing may be kosher, the community has exposed itself to outside influences with its openness to BTs, many of whom entered the Haredi world with training or experience in the craft of writing. Astaire (the “Jewish Jane Austen”) studied poetry in her 20s at the New School in New York; Branfman was a director of a Maine poets-in-schools program; and then there are the “crossover” writers like Ruchama King, who is a card-carrying MFA.

This diversity among the writers is reflected in their very different views of the role of the Haredi female writer and of frum literature in general. “The responsibility of a [Haredi woman] writer,” said Menucha Levin, is to “counteract the negative things that come out” about the community. Ami, for example, is occasionally strident in its stance toward the non-Orthodox world. The magazine made an unfortunate name for itself with a photoshopped cover of the White House draped with Nazi flags, and publisher Rechy Frankfurter’s husband, Rabbi Yitzchok Frankfurter, caused another stir when he wrote in an editorial, “[R]eligious vigilantism over Jewish history was not an altogether negative phenomenon.” Would the outspoken tone of the publication apply to the inside workings of the community as well? Rechy Frankfurter said, “We don’t see ourselves as a vehicle [within our community] for preaching or exposés … [but] as advocates and ambassadors for the Orthodox Jewish world.”

I might have gotten a similar view from Ruth Lichtenstein, a woman many see as dean of the Haredi press, scion of an eminent rabbinic family, author of books in English and Hebrew, and editor of the English-language edition of the Hamodia daily newspaper. However, Mrs. Levy, Lichtenstein’s secretary, told me in no uncertain terms and a formidable Yiddish accent that “Mrs. Lichtenstein does not grant interviews.”

In contrast to Rechy Frankfurter, some Haredi journalists and authors see themselves as writers first and Haredim second, a view, they say, made possible by the community’s increased confidence and openness. “I don’t write for anybody. When I do, that’s when my stories are in trouble. My words are my words, my life is my life,” said Ruchama King, whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Tablet, and the Jewish Week, as well as the “hemishe” magazines from Ami to Aish HaTorah. “We can be a little more confident with ourselves at this point,” agreed Lepon. “The frum community is very strong. We should allow women to express their experiences.”

In this spirit of openness some writers normalize what other Haredim find shameful—the fact that some leave the community; Ruth Lichtenstein, the editor of Hamodia, had a daughter who left ultra-Orthodoxy and wrote a book under an assumed name about sexual abuse in the community, about which Menucha Levin said, “Every family has one kid [who’s] going off the derech. It’s not such a big deal.” Shoshana Lepon said that child-rearing style and the approach to writing are mutually reinforcing. “The whole community needs to have more self confidence. That applies to the writing as well. We can share problems without it meaning that there’s something terrible happening.”

Yet even Haredi women who feel free to express their experiences still run up against the bounds of ultra-Orthodox internal censorship. All the writers I talked to acknowledged limits on what magazines or book publishers would allow in print, but few wanted to talk about them on the record. For example, pregnancy and childbirth are off limits if a teenage girl is a character, said Menucha Levin, adding, like any good writer would, “there are ways of alluding to things without telling them explicitly.”

A different kind of writing is being curated by Shoshana Lepon, called “Just Between Us—Jewish Women Get Personal.” Lepon said, “It will provide a platform for Jewish women to write about personal topics: birth, marriage, widowhood, breast cancer, mikvah, divorce. We’re trying to aim for the gut. [Writers] can’t send this stuff anywhere,” because “there’s a very strong censorship” currently in Haredi publications. Lepon conceded, however, that Mishpacha magazine has recently opened itself to such topics, and that “Binah is showing life like it is.”


Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

1 2View as single page
Print Email
J Sigman says:

I must say, though, that, despite any occasional controversies, Ami is the best of the bunch. It’s most interesting and has the widest coverage of the lot.
The author doesn’t consider the fact that woman have more secular education in the ultra-Orthodox world as a reason that they are so prominent in Jewish publishing, but I suspect that may be one reason.

chayar says:

Like secular publications, Orthodox Jewish periodicals differ, each has its bias. Some are more liberal, some more conservative (politically as well as hashkafically). Most borrow from the from the secular world (some craft “tabloid-type” headlines).
Some orthodox writers are better at their craft than others–you didn’t mention Sarah Yocheved Rigler and Tzipporah Heller, who some consider to be among the best and/or most influential English-language writers/teachers in the religious world. Miriam Millhauser Castle is a former lawyer who is another fantastic writer.

I love Ami, too! It’s hip and in touch with issues and ideas that appeal to a wide audience. Love Biz writer, Yedida Wolfe.

Pam Green says:

“Sexual immortality”?! You might want to fix that typo.

survival of the species!

Flo_J says:

Why the need to bash Orthodoxy, in a piece that purports to be about journalism and writing? I don’t agree that we Orthodox or Chassidic women are uneducated; most are very literate and well-versed in Torah studies (we study more Chumash, Navi, and Jewish History than the boys’ yeshivos) and many are equally knowledgeable and articulate in literature, science, and current world events.
Just because we’re wives and mothers doesn’t mean we’re brainless. I’m so tired of being insulted this way.

Where do I bash Orthodoxy, say that Orthodox or Chassidic women are uneducated, or insult them? Where do I call anyone brainless or imply that any of these writers are ignorant or inarticulate?

For Yiddish readers, Katle Kanye has an interesting response to this article.

For a more in depth exploration of the dynamics of chareidi literature one should read Yoel Finkelman’s, “Strictly Kosher Reading”. He discusses the phenomena of women writers in detail. ( )

bea lionson says:

Prairie Village, Kan????? Are you serious? It’s KS if you don’t know.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Haredi Women’s Lit Explodes

The writers and editors behind the astonishing rise of Orthodox magazines and fiction

More on Tablet:

The Most Important Thing Netanyahu Did in New York Wasn’t at the U.N.

By Yair Rosenberg — It was meeting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi