Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

The Book Thief: How Stolen Nazi Documents Made Their Way to American Jewish Archives

Did Zosa Szajkowski save precious documents from the Nazis, or did he steal the cultural patrimony of French Jews?

Print Email

This association of Jewish people with Jewish cultural treasures was not just a psychological phenomenon forged in grief. Archives, books, and other such cultural treasures have long been associated with nations and with sovereignty, and the association became particularly powerful in the 20th century. In Archive Fever, Jacques Derrida points out that the very meaning of “archive” comes from the Greek term arkheion, which referred to the home of the archon, or ruler; this was not just a private residence but also the house where official documents of public importance were domiciled. It is the task of the sovereign, he explains, to unify, identify, classify, and consign to the archives the documents deemed important for public memory. For nations with states, cultural treasures such as archives have thus usually been protected with the tools provided by statehood, and they have been domiciled at the seat of state power, however that has been conceived. Yet at the war’s end, there was no sovereign Jewish power, and no single, agreed-upon place that was considered “home”: This was an archive without an archon or an arkheion.


Szajkowski was first publicly denounced as an archive thief in Strasbourg, on April 13, 1961. By then, he was an exceedingly well-published historian, although working outside the academy. Jewish Studies had not yet entered the university system in full force in either France or the United States, so his non-professorial status was in itself not unusual for a Jewish historian at the time. His association with YIVO continued to give him the legitimacy he needed to pursue his scholarship, as it did for many refugee scholars like him. Since 1946 he had worked at YIVO in New York as an archivist and researcher and would remain there until his death in 1978. His arrangement there allowed him frequent leaves of absence to pursue his research in France, and through the 1950s he published an average of seven scholarly articles a year, all based on original research, focusing primarily on the emancipation and modernization of the Jews in France in the 18th and 19th centuries. These articles depended on sources he cited as having seen all over France, particularly in regional (departmental and municipal) public archives. In one of his longest and most important studies, Autonomy and Communal Jewish Debts (1959), he cites documents held in the public archives (archives départementales, archives municipales, and the archives nationales) in Arles, Altkirsch, Avignon, Bordeaux, Carpentras, Cavaillon, Colmar, L’Isle-sur-Sorgue, Metz, Montpellier, Paris, and Strasbourg. The study has important implications for understanding antisemitism in modern France and has served to nuance the way emancipation has been conceived for generations of historians.

To Szajkowski himself, though, a study’s success was not to be measured by its argument. For him, good scholarship was to be judged on its sources, and in Autonomy, as elsewhere, much more space is devoted to presenting new sources than to developing the argument or explaining its stakes. Indeed, for Szajkowski, the writing of Jewish history had long suffered from a lack of attention to the sources in favor of big arguments, which to his thinking were little more than “bombast” or “apologetics.” His devotion to the sources as the key to history made the archives absolutely central to Szajkowski’s work, and the research involved in writing his historical studies must have been grueling, especially for someone trying to hold down a nonacademic, low-paying job in New York. It was on one of those research trips to France that Szajkowski was caught, red-handed, stealing documents from the Strasbourg Municipal Archives.

His time in the city was limited, and there was much to be seen, so he had asked permission to stay late with his materials after the archives closed on the evening of April 13, 1961. As they often did for researchers, the archivists locked up but let him take the documents he was working on across the hall to the municipal library, located in the same building. At around 6:30 p.m., a librarian, Mme. Solveen, saw him tearing pages out of a volume of bound documents from the 18th century. The document he was removing at that very moment concerned, somewhat ironically, a law expelling Jews without a fixed address from Alsace, issued in 1784 by the Conseil Souverain d’Alsace.

Opening Szajkowski’s briefcase, Solveen found several other documents he had taken that day. She called the chief archivist, Philippe Dollinger (himself a noted historian), who together with the concierge accompanied Szajkowski back to his room at the Hôtel Royal, where they retrieved 73 additional documents and 21 printed pamphlets belonging to the Strasbourg Municipal Archives. They confiscated these but then, strangely, left him alone in the room rather than having him arrested.

In the morning, Szajkowski was gone, having escaped across the border to Germany during the night. In his hotel room, police found 70 more documents, none of which were from the Strasbourg Municipal Archives. Some were identified and sent back to other institutions in France; others were never identified and now form the small Frydmann-Szajkowski Collection of the Strasbourg Municipal Archives.

The city did press charges, after archive officials learned in June that Szajkowski had earned £1,160, then equivalent to about $3,400, by selling items stolen from French archives to one of the most important Judaica book dealers of the day, Albi Rosenthal, who was based in Oxford, England. The unsuspecting Rosenthal had sent his newest Judaica catalog to the archives, and officials were dismayed to see items from their own collection on the list. They turned the catalog over to police investigators, who determined that Szajkowski had sold the dealer materials that had come from Bordeaux, Avignon, Carpentras, Aix-en-Provence, Marseilles, Strasbourg, Metz, and Paris, and noted that these were the same towns the scholar had visited on research trips in 1950, 1955, and 1961. They thus concluded that he had been stealing from French public archives for a long time—a habitual criminal rather than a poor, struggling historian who had made a mistake in judgment.

Rosenthal, eager to protect his reputation, traveled to New York to talk to Szajkowski. The historian vehemently denied having committed the crime, though he refused to return to France to defend his innocence because, he said, of the terrible pain he was then experiencing from the near-fatal wound he had suffered in the war. The sources don’t tell us how Rosenthal reacted to Szajkowski’s insistence on his innocence and wartime heroism, but the Strasbourg investigators saw it as irrelevant and Szajkowski as an outlaw. Nevertheless, the city decided it was not worth the expense to extradite Szajkowski from New York. So, in 1963, Szajkowski was convicted of theft in absentia, sentenced to three years in prison, and fined 5,000 francs. It is all but certain that Szajkowski never returned to France after 1961, thus ending his career as a collector of French Judaica.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8View as single page
Print Email

This is a marvelous book, bought it three years ago, introduced it to members of my writing group, who all found it witty, informative and of course beautifully written.

I am happy that Szajkowski stole those archives. So happy. With the recent discovery of 42 500 WW2 forced labor camps, ghettoes and concentration camps in Europe, it is inconceivable that no-one knew what was going on with Jews in Europe. THEY HAD TO HAVE KNOWN. I WAS EVERYWHERE.
Europe quite simply DOES NOT DESERVE to have these artifacts remaining in Europe. Jews, especially French Jews,Norwegian, Danish, Swedish Jews are fleeing Europe once again because of Islamic radicalism. At least in America they are safe for the future. They would probably be safe in Israel too where most Jews of the world now live-in an underground vault. So I salute Szajkowski for being a book thief. The EU is once again in the hands of radical fascists-left wing fascists who abuse and do not protect Jews from antisemitism and attacks by leftwing and Islamic radicals, trying make Europe Judenrein once again.

herbcaen says:

As Europe evolves into Eurabia, the documents are safe in the US and Israel. Everything else in Europe will meet the fate of the Buddhas in Bamiyan, as Europes museums are put to the torch by the latest invasion of the vandals

With modern methods, by scanning and emailing manuscripts can easily be “located” in more than one library or archive at the same time, and be available to researchers at both or in fact anywhere. This provides a solution to any remaining problems of disputed ownership of documents caused by the subject here. Actually, the European archives would be better off with electronic copies of missing documents, since they would have them without needing space to store them, the cost of computerizing them, or any danger of them being stolen again, in a form most convenient for those wanting to see them.

rivkah fishman says:

Thank you. I remember Zosa Szajkowski very well. He was part of my youth and frequently a guest on Jewish holidays. He was a lonely man and a friend, colleague of my late father. He did not make money from selling those documents and was often in need. In the end, most of the documents are safe and available for scholars. R.I.P.

Stephan-www.twicemodern.wordpr says:

Thank you for an extremely well balanced review, a joy to read!
Much Jewish material was bought after WWII in the US and in Europe to alleviate the guilt of not helping 6 million Jews to escape their faith.Consequently protected and safeguarding memory and memorials became a well funded pathway to expropriate the remaining Jewry of their “holocaust”.The same German,French,Dutch etc institutions will gladly claim such ” cultural heritage” of their slain citizens of Jewish faith,justifying an Anti Israel attitude under the motto “look how we take care of your heritage here”. Nothing to see here folks ,just move on.Those institutions and many American Jews – in name- only in the US are no exception to the rule.Thank you again

margreet hirs says:

what a wonderful thief!


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

The Book Thief: How Stolen Nazi Documents Made Their Way to American Jewish Archives

Did Zosa Szajkowski save precious documents from the Nazis, or did he steal the cultural patrimony of French Jews?