Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Convert’s Tale

A new study assesses the 12th-century memoir attributed to ‘Herman the former Jew’

Print Email
A 12th-century painting of Paul and the recipients of his letters. (Wikimedia Commons)

Sometime in the 12th century CE, at the monastery of Cappenberg in western Germany, a fascinating and enigmatic document was produced. Its Latin title, Opusculum de conversione sua, means “A Short Work About his Conversion,” and it is attributed to Hermannus quondam Judaeus—“Herman the former Jew.” What makes this work especially significant, writes Jean-Claude Schmitt in his newly translated study The Conversion of Herman the Jew: Autobiography, History, and Fiction in the Twelfth Century (University of Pennsylvania Press), is that it “is presented in a form that we today call an autobiography.” At a time when autobiographical writing was very rare, a memoir written in Latin by a Jew was unique.

For centuries, the Christian clerics and scholars who read Herman’s book took it at face value, as the confession of a Jew who learned to cast off the darkness and ignorance of Judaism and embrace the truth of Christianity. The Opusculum functioned, in other words, as a textual weapon in the fight against Judaism. Schmitt points out that the first printed edition of the work, in 1687, is included in an anthology of anti-Jewish polemics, whose frontispiece shows a dagger that “reaches out from a celestial cloud and threatens a terrified old rabbi.”

But in the last few decades, Schmitt shows, the Opusculum has become the subject of a new and intense debate. It began in 1988, when Avrom Saltman of Bar Ilan University published an article arguing that no such person as Herman the Jew ever existed. The text was, rather, a “work of fiction, an edifying autobiographical novel,” written by Christians for Christian audiences, in which a genuinely Jewish voice is never heard. This “radical position,” Schmitt sums up, “completely changed the terms of the historiographical debate,” and in the last 20 years medieval historians have argued over whether the Opusculum is fraudulent. If this debate is unusually heated, it is because, as Schmitt puts it, any opinion about the truth or falsehood of Herman’s account rests on “a critical question: could Jews in the past have abandoned the faith of their ancestors consciously and without the usual physical threat?”

The best place to start reading Schmitt’s complex but elegant study is at the end, where the full text of the Opusculum de conversione sua is included as an appendix. (In English, it runs to just under 40 pages.) “Now, then, I, Herman, who was once called Judah, am a sinner and an unworthy priest,” the account begins. “I am of the Israelite people and the tribe of Levi and I was born of David, my father, and Sephora, my mother, in the city of Cologne.” This was the heartland of Ashkenazi Jewry; Rashi lived in the nearby city of Troyes and would have died just a few years before the birth of this Judah ben David Halevi, which scholars date to around 1107 CE.

Ashkenaz was also, at this time, a community in deep crisis. Less than a decade earlier, Crusaders had ravaged the Jewish Rhineland, killing thousands and forcing thousands more to choose between conversion and suicide. This historical background does not enter directly into Herman’s text, but it might, Schmitt argues, inform his discussion of the best way to convert a Jew to Christianity. No one, Herman emphasizes, forced him to convert or threatened him. Rather, he shows a number of pious Christians patiently teaching him, reasoning with him, and praying for him to see the light. He is especially grateful to one Richmar, a kindhearted priest who “acted as a disciple of the true law of the gospel, in which it is said, ‘love your enemies, do good to them that hate you.’ ” Herman implores his readers to follow this example:

For [Richmar] did not curse me as perfidious and unworthy of Christian companionship. Instead, he most devotedly communicated to me works of charity and piety as though I were his fellow Christian. May those stirred with the zeal of piety be horrified at spitting upon the Jewish (or any other human) error, as some customarily do.

This is plausible as the voice of a former Jew, pleading for mercy for his benighted brethren. Yet later in the text, when he has made the decision to convert, we find Judah proudly kidnapping his 7-year-old half-brother, because “I most passionately wished for him to become with me a coinheritor of divine grace through the regenerative cleansing of baptism.” The misery of the boy’s mother, Herman’s stepmother, counts for nothing in comparison: “the excesses of her grief made her mad,” he writes, but though “she ran to the leading men of the city wailing bitterly, and with a sorrowful voice proclaimed that her son had been furtively abducted,” Herman managed to deposit the boy at a monastery. In the 19th century, when a young Italian Jewish boy named Edgardo Mortara was taken from his parents in this fashion, it raised a worldwide outcry; in the 12th century, even a former Jew like Herman saw nothing wrong with it.

But while these episodes seem convincingly lifelike, Schmitt shows that they are also thoroughly symbolic, since the Opusculum is totally structured by the logic of Christian anti-Judaism. Early in the account, for instance, Richmar proposes a bargain to the young Judah: “if, as a trial of his faith, he sensed no burning while carrying a hot iron in his hand (as one normally would), I would faithfully submit to the cure of holy baptism.” Before Richmar can make the experiment, however, his bishop forbids it, since “a sign that is displayed visibly to the external sight would be useless if [God] did not work invisibly through grace in the heart of a human being.”

The scene is carefully designed to drive home the central distinction between Christianity and Judaism, as Christians saw it. Jews only understand the literal and concrete, what is before their eyes—like grasping a piece of hot iron; but Christians understand that the literal is less important than the spiritual, that inward grace is better than outward fact. “This dichotomy,” Schmitt writes, “structures the entire opposition between Jews and Christians” in medieval thought, and it comes up over and over again in Herman’s text.

When Judah first enters a church, he is disgusted by the crucifix, which he considers a “monstrous idol” of the kind that God explicitly prohibited. But when he raises this objection with an abbot, he is taught that the crucifix is not an idol but an aid to piety: “externally we project the image of [Jesus’s] death through the likeness of the cross, internally we are inspired with love for him.” Later on, when his fellow Jews begin to notice Judah’s interest in Christianity, they hope to keep him in the fold by compelling him to get married—that is, by forcing him to lead the life of the body, of sex and procreation. After his conversion, however, Herman becomes a celibate monk, freeing himself from the body in order to live the life of the spirit.

If everything that happens in Herman’s account seems designed to drive home this same, classically anti-Jewish idea, does this mean that the story was invented for this purpose? Or might it mean that Herman has reinterpreted the actual experiences of his life in accordance with the logic of Christian anti-Judaism? For Schmitt, there is finally no way to decide; indeed, the question doesn’t make sense, since the idea of a factually truthful autobiography did not exist in the middle ages. To expect any 12th-century person to “sit down at his desk, alone, in order to write his memoirs,” in the way we might do today, is “totally anachronistic,” he writes. Rather, he argues that the Opusculum should be read as the collective work of a group of monks, writing for other monks, in order to communicate and reinforce their ideas of what Christianity is. Judaism, in Herman’s text as in so many Christian writings before and since, serves this purpose by being made to represent everything Christianity is not. In this way, The Conversion of Herman the Jew illustrates an age-old problem that still has not entirely disappeared: the difficulty of allowing Judaism to speak for itself in a Christian culture.

Print Email
Yaakov Freiburger says:

Troyes is not near Cologne, it´s 400 km away. Troyes is in France, and Cologne in Germany. You may have mixed it up with Worms and Speyer, both on the Rhineland in Germany, where Rashi also studied and lived.

I recently wrote a paper on this (although with the emphasis of connecting the narrative to a decidedly Jewish text and how the author — likely a Christian — twists and reforms the narrative for his own, Christian purposes), and after spending a great deal of time with the text and checking out Schmitt’s work (along with others), I came to the conclusion that the text was not written as an anti-Jewish polemic, but rather that it was written by a Christian for a Christian audience as if to say, “Listen, if this lowly Jew can convert and become a monk, then why can’t more of you Christians do the same — it should come easier to you!”

After all, if a Jew humble himself before G-d and take a vow of celibacy, anyone (especially a Christian) can. At least, in that period that would have been the sentiment.

stan nadel says:

Troyes was far away in France, but Trier was relatively nearby.

Look self hating Jewish people have always been with us. Norman Finklestein would have loved this guy.

Imagine kidnapping your own half brother! The poor woman whose child he stole, I wonder if she ever knew what a monster this guy was.

FRENCHMAN says:

http://www.myjewishlearning.com/history/Ancient_and_Medieval_History/632-1650/Christendom/Jewish-Christian_Relations/Disputations.shtml
FROM JEWISH IDEAS DAILY IS A MESSIANIC(CHRISTIAN)WEBSITE
THE MAIN ROLE OF THIS SITE IS TO TEACH CHRISTIANITY TO JEWS BY DECEPTION
BY FAKING THAT IS THE JEWISH THOUGHT.
FOR EXEMPLE: THE INFAMOUS TORTOSA DISPUTATION JUST WASN’T.THERE WAS NO DISCUTION .JUST READ THE ARTICLE IN WIKIPEDIA..

Very useful post, really helped me plus thanks for mentioning concerning the plugin to control unnecessary pinging.

Sorry for the vast drill, but I’m rattling tender the new Zune, and this, as wellspring as the superior reviews whatever different people human codified, leave supply you settle if it’s the manus deciding for you.

Thanks for the article. My partner and i have generally observed that a lot of people are desperate to lose weight since they wish to appear slim and also attractive. Even so, they do not usually realize that there are other benefits to losing weight in addition. Doctors state that fat people suffer from a variety of diseases that can be directly attributed to their excess weight. The good thing is that people who’re overweight as well as suffering from diverse diseases can help to eliminate the severity of their own illnesses by simply losing weight. You are able to see a gradual but marked improvement in health when even a small amount of fat reduction is accomplished gywl512.

I keep listening to the news speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one.

Thanks for every one of your work on this web page. Kate delights in managing investigation and it’s obvious why. Many of us hear all relating to the compelling medium you provide very helpful solutions through the web blog and as well as boost participation from website visitors on that situation then our daughter is without question discovering a whole lot. Take advantage of the remaining portion of the year. You’re the one conducting a dazzling job.

Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

Your site is very helpful. I found the information that I need and I will come back. Best Christmas Gift

There are certainly quite a lot of particulars like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I provide the ideas above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you carry up the place the most important thing will likely be working in sincere good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged round things like that, however I’m certain that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each girls and boys really feel the affect of only a moment’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

Thanks for the recommendations shared on your own blog. Another thing I would like to convey is that weight loss is not information on going on a dietary fads and trying to lose as much weight as you can in a few months. The most effective way to lose weight naturally is by having it slowly but surely and right after some basic suggestions which can assist you to make the most through your attempt to slim down. You may understand and already be following some tips, nevertheless reinforcing knowledge never hurts.

What i do not realize is actually how you’re not actually much more well-liked than you might be right now. You are very intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this subject, produced me personally consider it from numerous varied angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated unless it’s one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs great. Always maintain it up!

I’ve said that least 1555585 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

fantastic post, very informative. I wonder why the opposite specialists of this sector don’t realize this. You should continue your writing. I’m confident, you have a huge readers’ base already!

online dating cons says:

I wanted to make sure i commented on this subject.
I am enjoying your dicussion.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Convert’s Tale

A new study assesses the 12th-century memoir attributed to ‘Herman the former Jew’

More on Tablet:

Jack’s Wife Freda’s Rosh Hashanah Specialty

By Stephanie Butnick — The NYC restaurant will be serving honey and red wine-braised short ribs