Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

European Modernism, in Hebrew

With a rediscovered 1930s novel, Viennese Romance, Austrian writer David Vogel becomes a key figure in the creation of Modern Hebrew literature

Print Email
A postcard written by David Vogel from Paris, 1925. (Photoillustration Tablet Magazine; original photos P K/Flickr and Kedem Auction House)
Related Content

Foundation Myths

Stifling debate on the Nakba—the Arabic word for catastrophe and how Palestinians refer to Israel’s founding—prevents a free and open discussion of the historical record

Vogel’s newly discovered manuscript is also marked by suicide and death. Yet, unlike Married Life, the protagonist, Michael Rost, is a writer with a wealthy patron; he frequents Yiddish-speaking restaurants, and the objects of his desire, a mother and daughter, live with financial uncertainty. Focusing on the sexual, the book explores Rost’s passions in a shockingly blunt way. “Vogel made Rost completely unreflective,” Nethanel recently told Haaretz. “He cast him as a hedonistic type, which he himself wanted to be.” She believes that the manuscript was an early autobiographical work—Vogel was himself involved in a mother-daughter romance—that was likely shelved in the mid-1920s.

For Vogel—the Jew in Europe, the non-Zionist in Tel Aviv, the Russian in Vienna, the Austrian in Paris—tortuous relationships are a literary device to explore his existence as an outsider. Taken together, Married Life and Viennese Romance demonstrate Vogel’s perspective on otherness. In Married Life, the alienated Vogel is content with an abusive relationship because of his ability to conceal himself in the enormity of 1920s Vienna and his writing. In Viennese Romance, Vogel casts himself in a comfortable financial position and in control of not one but two relationships.

His books lack strong Jewish markers, but, given their obsession with the outsider, they are incredibly Jewish novels. In Viennese Romance, the protagonist notes an encounter with a group of Eastern European Jewish immigrants on their way to Palestine. Vogel described their destination as a “barren wasteland in the Near East” and apparently made an attempt to erase the passage in his manuscript. This passage is clearly legible and made it to the final edited version of the book sold in Israel.

While Vogel’s work remains in print, it has always been one step removed from the larger trends in the development of Hebrew literature. In the late 1990s, a group of Israeli scholars at Berkeley and the Hebrew University re-engaged with Vogel’s work. This act of revisionism, as Pinkser put it, has led to a fuller debate about the existence of a Modern Hebrew literature free of nationalist connotations.

“He refused to be read in the context of nationalist Hebrew,” Nethanel told me. “He was always in a position of withdrawal. He lived in various cities—Vienna, Tel Aviv, Paris—but was always one step removed, never a full participant in the life of his given context. But more importantly, he understood how Hebrew would develop and he wrote for the future.”

Above all else, David Vogel was a writer whose work gave him the ability to transcend the nationalist passions consuming Europe and the Middle East at the time that he died. The discovery of an unknown Vogel manuscript serves as an eerie reminder that the regeneration of the Hebrew language was rooted in the life of the Diaspora.

***

Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

1 2View as single page
Print Email
jacob_arnon says:

I read  Married Life a couple of years ago and while I found the novel interesting from a psychological point of view (it describes a sado-masochistic relationship between a Jews and a domineering Germanic woman) it was hard to sympathize with the masochistic male anti-hero.

In the article Mr. Dana focuses on Vogel’s rejection of “zionism” but he erroneously views  that rejection from a political point of view. What Vogel and some other Jewish writers (like Joseph Roth) of the period rejected was the notion that they should take responsibility for their own lives.   Ironically that rejection led to their death. 

Dana doesn’t really explore what it meant for Jewish writers like Vogel to reject Jewish emancipation. Had he done so his article would have been much more interesting. 

I will definitely read Vogel’s discovered novel and I feel said that brilliant writers like him didn’t have  a chance to develop their further in antisemitic Europe.

jacob_arnon says:

I read Alter’s article which alerted me to the existence of the novel  נישואים   חי   רומאן / דוד פוגל

I would like to add that I wish reviewers of literature of the 20′s and 30′s stop treating Jewish intellectuals who rejected Zionism as “heroes” They were not most of them died because they misread history.

jacob_arnon says:

Sorry, the article by Alter I was thinking of was published in his book:  ”Hebrew and Modernity”  in 1994

http://www.amazon.com/Hebrew-Modernity-Robert-Alter/dp/0253304733/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335559362&sr=8-1 
5.0 out of 5 stars

jacob_arnon says:

I would like to thank Professor Pinsker, whose “Literary Passports” is on my reading list, for posting the links to very important articles about the history of Hebrew literature. 

I don’t know how I missed Robert Alter’s essay in TNR since I read that magazine religiously and hold Dr. alter to be a unique scholar and translator comparable only as Cynthia Ozick said to past translators such as Wycliffe, Tynsdale, Martin Luther,  and a few others.

Still I disagreed with his endorsement of  Michael Andre Bernstein who builds a grand theory about side shadowing that condemns any view that people living in catastrophic times can’t be condemned for the choices they made since the future could have been otherwise. 

Still as Ruth Wisse had observed the Yiddish poet Jacob Glatstein had condemned  Polish Jewry in 1938 when he went back to Poland to tend to his dying mother, because they made no effort to evade the looming tragedy that he and many other foresaw. Gladstein wasn’t either sideshadowing or foreshadowing he was preciting what actually did occur (thought not the details—what sane person could have done that?).

The other reason I don’t have a high opinion of Bernstein’s “Foregone conclusions” is that one author he condemns is Aharon Appelfeld and even there mostly a single novella “Baddenheim 1939″ while the books he opposes against it is Musil’s The Man Without Qualities’ which deals with WWI a very different event. 

This is a complicated affair and it would take many more pages to cover it completely. 

Again, thank you Professor Pinsker for the links. 

jacob_arnon says:

I hope the paucity of comments doesn’t mean that only two or three people have read this important article?

I have been thinking about “Hebrew European Modernism” and was wondering how without a Hebrew speaking community whether in Israel or Europe the writer had hoped to cultivate an audience. Moreover did they think that their efforts would last for more than one or at most two generations?

These writers came out of a religious tradition which they rejected. Now, given that that tradition was in jeopardy and not only because of murderous antisemitism but because of modernity itself how would further generations of Hebrew writers had been cultivated if that religious tradition would not have survived. 

If you look at the US  you can see what would have happened in eastern Europe even under the most benevolent of social circumstances. 

Hebrew writing neve became a part of American literary life. (maybe this is why scholars like Alter feel such nostalgia for writers like Vogel.)

In Israel on the other hand Hebrew writers modernist as well as anti-modernists cared very much about the future of the language. 

You  can see this in the wonderful children’s stories many of the best Israeli writers like Leah Goldberg, Amos Oz, David Grossman, to mention only some of the better known names  in the US , wrote. 

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

European Modernism, in Hebrew

With a rediscovered 1930s novel, Viennese Romance, Austrian writer David Vogel becomes a key figure in the creation of Modern Hebrew literature

More on Tablet:

Italian Politician’s Primo Levi Parody Panned

By Stephanie Butnick — Beppe Grillo under fire for anti-government poem based on ‘If This Is a Man’