Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

In Defense of Bernie

Like Moses, who staked his place in history to defend his people after the Golden Calf debacle, Madoff, too, realized that the true value of money isn’t always what it seems

Print Email
Bernie Madoff leaving federal court in New York, March 10, 2009. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

As a young boy growing up in a fairly traditional Israeli family with a rich rabbinic history, I was raised to see the Bible’s heroes as history’s ultimate good guys. For the most part, this wasn’t a problem. Any kid, after all, can dig David the giant-slayer, secretly wish he could talk to animals like Solomon the wise, or read in awe about Abraham’s knife-wielding blind faith. But I never understood Moses. Moses made no sense.

This week’s parasha provides a good example of the man’s strange nature. Moses climbs up to the mountain to receive the word of God, tarries in returning, climbs down, and sees the Golden Calf. Reading the story as a child, I was incensed on his behalf: Having just witnessed the true spirit of God, I asked myself, the Israelites couldn’t even give Moses the benefit of the doubt for running a bit behind schedule? Are a few weeks truly that much of a setback that a nation that had just been awarded the Torah would resolve to break the divine rules and erect a shining statue? And, most troubling of all, what to make of Moses’ own baffling response? Rather than fume at the ungrateful idolaters, Moses wrestles with God on their behalf. The supreme being is in a genocidal state of mind; bravely, Moses takes a stand and demands that God spare the Israelites. “If you do not forgive them,” he tells the Lord, “blot me out from the book that you have written.” Why go through all that trouble, risking anonymity in perpetuity, to protect a sinful horde?

Just ask Bernie Madoff.

The disgraced financier is not a man usually associated with biblical wisdom, but a series of recent disclosures, including interviews with Madoff himself, suggest that he and Moses might have shared a fundamental understanding of the human condition. Speaking to a reporter from the New York Times, Madoff argued that the various banks and financial institutions he’d defrauded were guilty of “willful blindness,” and that there was no way these large and savvy investors—as opposed to private individuals—did not know his unnaturally profitable operation was a sham.

Some newly released documents support Madoff’s claim. Earlier this month, for example, internal communications of JPMorgan Chase employees were made public in a lawsuit, indicating that some at the bank were suspicious of Madoff long before he was arrested. On June of 2007, a senior executive at the bank, the Times reported, sent an email to colleagues and said that another executive at Chase “just told me that there is a well-known cloud over the head of Madoff and that his returns are speculated to be part of a Ponzi scheme.”

Much of Madoff’s recent statements, of course, are self-serving, an attempt, perhaps, to lessen the effect of his grievous actions. But there’s much more we can learn from his comments that the banks were somehow complicit in his crime: What Madoff understood, the fundamental truth lying at the heart of his deceptions, was not that people are greedy, but that people would go to tremendous lengths to try and overcome the basic unknowability, the profound impermanence that is at the core of human existence. People invested with Madoff because he suggested that he could turn the market—tempestuous, unpredictable, sometimes vengeful, frequently wild—into a tamed beast that behaved just as you liked it to behave, a reliable animal that gave and gave and asked for nothing in return. And the banks collaborated not only because great wealth was being generated, but also because Madoff’s fantasy was too strong to resist.

It’s the same story, essentially, as this week’s parasha. As the story begins, the Israelites are introduced to God, a mysterious and invisible being that presents them with rules but is never entirely familiar to them. They are awed, but their awe soon turns to anxiety. Like the Wilpons and the Picowers and Madoff’s other victims, they needed something permanent, something they could grasp, something controlled and controllable, something so unlike God. They ask for a calf, and Aaron, the great priest, doesn’t hesitate for a moment: He collects their jewelry and fashions them an idol. Like the gentlemen at JPMorgan Chase, he understands that what’s truly at stake is not material but spiritual, and that what the people are asking for is assurance in a world that has none.

Moses, the wisest of leaders, knows all of this, and he refuses to succumb to the Lord’s wrath. Even God’s divine book, he knows, is written for humans, and no story is more human than striving to eliminate uncertainty. If the punishment for such human actions is genocide, he tells God, write me out of the book.

And God is soothed. He understands—neither for the first time in the Good Book nor for the last—that his people are stiff-necked, and that no matter how many signs they’re given, they’re still likely to abandon his ways for any fleeting chance at tangible, earthly representations of divinity. He realizes that the laws he advocates depend on faith, not evidence and are, therefore, an abstraction. And he knows that the people congregated in the desert, sweating and scared, vie for the concrete. Therefore, he forgives—he orders the Israelites to destroy their remaining jewelry, but he spares them their lives. There’s no other way to reconcile God and Man.

If he’s studying the Torah in his North Carolina jail cell, Bernie Madoff may take some comfort in this bit of divine good will. And let us, too, show Bernie some mercy: His crimes are terrible, but they transcend simple greed or sheer arrogance. As we learn from this week’s parasha, we’ve had Madoffs since the dawn of time, and we will continue to have them, most likely, for as long as we strive to impose order on a world that is unruly, for as long as we think we can fashion our own gods, for as long, that is, as we’re human.

Print Email
RRothman says:

How romantic. Madoff’s crimes don’t transcend ANYTHING. He is a crook. Period. Comparisons to Moses…FEY!

jennifer says:

Agreed. I read the headline and thought “whoah, that’s gutsy”, feeling slightly offended. Then I read the article. Honestly I don’t see the comparison. Madoff is no martyr and no Moses. If you were looking to write an inflammatory article, you’ve done a great job. Try explaining how Moses-like he is to the hundreds of elderly who were fooled by Madof. See how far that gets you.

Preston says:

Interesting comparison, but I believe your conclusions are not logical. First of all, the situation of striving for a “golden calf-like” assurance in the financial market and Bernie Madoff giving it to them doesn’t make Madoff like Moses, it makes him like Aaron in the story. Did Madoff do anything to intercede on behalf of his victims? Not at all. His sons turned him in.

Second, just because Madoff’s crimes have transcendent aspects, that does not explain why Madoff should be shown any mercy. That smacks more of a Christian notion of forgiveness, that to my understanding is based more on blind compassion than forgiveness in response to an effort to make atonement. I don’t think Madoff should be given any human mercy until he apologizes for his actions – divine mercy is ultimately up to God.

Lastly, I don’t see how showing mercy to Madoff does anything to address or alleviate the human tendency to “fashion our own gods.”

The overwhelmingly sad truth in our modern scenario is that in relation to the Wall St. entities and individuals who built the toxic-asset-faux-golden-calf, Bernie, was a bit player. Enobling him by imputing a Moses-like depth of conscience and consciousness might make a great fictional rant (think Phillip Roth) or an interesting thought-experiment but in the context of a straight-ahead, earnest-seeming Tablet piece untempered by any post-modern irony, it confers way too much generosity of spirit on a ganev.

Dude, the comparison is absurd.

Bijoou says:

Really, REALLY nuts! And not even funny!

Liel– I`ve read and reread this article, but it isn`t Moses that makes no sense. It is you.
When I went to hebrew school we were taught that when Moses came down
from the mountain and saw the golden calf that the first thing he did
was to smash the stone 10 comandments. No plea for understanding there.
The argument that Madoff`s crimes transcend simple greed makes no sense.
That is all it was–greed. He was not attempting to make abstractions
concrete. He was hell bent to make as much money as possible.
Better luck next pasha.

Moses. Bernie Madoff. Lahavdil.

The greatest counter-argument to what you’re trying to say here, Liel, is his callous reaction to his son’s death. More than anything, this continues to haunt me about Bernie Madoff.

R. Miller says:

Maybe this piece should have been entitled: “In Defense of a Fakakta Comparison” . . .and published on April 1st?

not buying it. moses good. madoff bad. this is the epitome of unjustified justification.

Among the very many truly awful pieces LL has written for Tablet, this one really takes the cake. He’s a fool. Message to Tablet: SET YOURSELF FREE AND LOSE THIS LOSER.

mordechai & esther says:

its pure purim torah folks.

Madoff deserves no sympathy. He exhibits the signs of a true sociopath, who willingly broke the law, disregarded right from wrong, and destroyed many lives in doing so. Disappointing article.

Matthew P Sprague says:

Moses & Madoff… isn’t that like an oxymoron?

Frank Messmann says:

Madoff probably is a sociopath, but among his Jewish associates he was highly respected for his ability to deviously guarantee a 12% return on an investment — “Jewish CD’s.”

reuven says:

c’mon Tablet. I’m not saying you need a Rabbi Riskin to do your Parsha column, but something a little more intellectually, literary, and spiritually sophisticated would serve your readers better. At least, I think so. Seems like some others do as well.

Toby Harris says:

I thought it was pretty funny – tongue in cheek, people. Lighten up.

We get it, you hate Israel and your traditional background. Why not try therapy instead of writing these increasingly inane, illogical articles?

If this is tongue in cheek, it is very badly done. If it is not, you need a lesson in fundamental morality.
By any measure Madoff is a crook. He knowingly defrauded money for his own pleasure! Get it.

I’ve said that least 3624118 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

You must know, your post goes to the center from the issue. Your clearness leaves me wanting to know extra. merely so you know, i will instantly grab your feed to keep up to date with your website. Sounding Out thanks is purely my little way of saying bravo for a wonderful resource. Accept my nicest wishes for your inflowing article.

hi!,I love your writing so much! proportion we communicate more approximately your article on AOL? I require a specialist in this house to resolve my problem. Maybe that is you! Looking forward to see you.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

In Defense of Bernie

Like Moses, who staked his place in history to defend his people after the Golden Calf debacle, Madoff, too, realized that the true value of money isn’t always what it seems

More on Tablet:

The Best Passover Snack You’ve Never Heard Of

By Carol Ungar — Matzos Coffee, the sweet, sugary European treat that’s as simple as it sounds