Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Intellectual Jihad

‘Terror and Liberalism’ author Paul Berman on the State Department decision to allow Muslim intellectual Tariq Ramadan to visit the U.S.

Print Email
Tariq Ramadan (Anoek De Groot/AFP/Getty Images)

With the 2003 publication of his groundbreaking book Terror and Liberalism, Paul Berman became one of the most influential and incisive interpreters of Islamist political discourse for a general audience in America and England. A protégé of the literary critic and socialist intellectual Irving Howe, Berman was awarded a MacArthur Foundation “genius” grant for his writing about politics and literature and the revolutionary aspirations of the social movements that came out of the 1960s in Latin America and elsewhere. He is currently finishing a book about the Islamist intellectual superstar Tariq Ramadan and his Western intermediaries, like Ian Buruma and Timothy Garton Ash, which came out of a controversial piece that Berman wrote denouncing Ramadan and his Western admirers for The New Republic. Berman’s new book, Flight of the Intellectuals, is due out from Melville House in April.

Tablet sat down with Berman to talk about the State Department’s decision on Wednesday to reverse the Bush Administration’s policy to ban Tariq Ramadan from the United States and instead to grant him a visa to speak on the U.S. lecture circuit.

Tariq Ramadan is coming to America. Is it a mistake for the Obama administration to let him in?

It’s a good move for the U.S. to encourage freedom of speech and open debate. It’s a mistake, however, to imagine that he has positive contributions to make.

Ramadan has no deep, important thoughts we need to hear?

I do think it’s worth the trouble to look into his deep thoughts, and to notice how problematic they are. He can say something attractive at the level of a slogan; but when you examine it more closely it turns out to have unexpected meanings. He opposes terrorism but he does it with a series of asterisks. If you read the footnote in tiny print you discover some troubling aspects regarding terrorism, and this is borne out by the fact that he did donate money to a Hamas charity. To do so was not illegal at the time, and he has himself argued he didn’t know where his money was going. But if you read Ramadan carefully you would not be surprised to learn he donates money to such groups.

In my book I have more to say about Ramadan’s own philosophical ideas, which I find pretty appalling and obscurantist.

How can so many Western intellectuals, like Buruma and Garton Ash, just to name two, be so wrong about Ramadan?

The main reason they are attracted to Ramadan’s ideas is because of a bias against Muslims that leads many people to think the Muslim world, which contains 1.5 billion people, is incapable of producing genuinely attractive thinkers. Of course this is untrue, but because so many people believe it, they turn to Tariq Ramadan.

Another reason is that there is a Western fantasy that some messianic Muslim figure will step forward and resolve all the outstanding problems between Islam and the West. There’s a search for the great Muslim hope. Ramadan is put into that role, and he puts himself into it. To imagine that such a figure will step forward also reflects a bias against the Muslim world, since it suggests there is such a thing as the Muslim world—when in fact there is not any such thing. Islam has 10,000 sects and heresies and 100,000 episodes in its history, on the one hand. On the other hand, there are 56 states in the Organization of the Islamic Conference, each of which has its own history. So we’re talking about 1.5 billion people resting on 1,400 years of history. It’s absurd to think of this as constituting a single unit. The idea that it does constitute a single unit is a doctrine of the Islamist movement—with a single movement you have a single leader, like the caliph.

The defense of Tariq Ramadan in intellectual circles reflects a series of unexamined and in some cases very unattractive assumptions. I have expressed myself on this and will be doing so again at length, with gusto.

Print Email
Gary Leon Goldman says:

The Muslim world does exist, at least to the degree that it is united by anti-Zionism. There seems to be near unanimity on that issue, and the intensity of feeling is extreme.

billie says:

It kills me, a bona fide liberal, that so many of today’s liberals have sided with societies in which they would not last for two seconds. Their hypocrisy makes me ill. They should, for example, discuss equal rights for women and gays with anybody in Hamas leadership; I dare them.

Roberta Hodges says:

A good article, but one that also avoids going the final step to the truth. The case the author makes, that the vast diversity in Muslim experiences, habits, ethnicities, and locations proves there is no Umma is incorrect. And worse: To assume “a bias” on the part of Westerners who accept Islam’s own description of its diaspora, is to impose yet a further accusation of false guilt on our society (ie their victims)! There is one element that unites – or CAN unite – Muslims in lock step at any time, in the tick of an eye is this: The call of the Koran and Shariah “in danger”. To understand this, the author should ask a Danish cartoonist, the Russians, or the embattled Dutch about this. In other words, it’s their comprehensive political ideology masking as a religion that must always reject democracy, with its multitude of freedoms.

Gideon W says:

June 4, 2007 was the date of the New Republic issue that featured the article. The article is very long, like a small book, but a really fine essay, worth reading.

Dickie SIlverstein says:

Let’s import a lot of jihadis so we can all become dhimmis in an Ameristan! I yearn to grovel before the Islamists!

Interesting interview.

It’s worth noting that the Obama administration has gone so far to deny the threat from jihadism that the official Pentagon report on Major Hassan doesn’t even mention his religious motives. Pathetic.

We can’t defeat our enemies if we won’t even listen to what they are saying; let alone understand them. It’s also worth noting that the Obama administration initially indicted support for a UN ban on “religious heresy”. Let’s be clear about the many dangers from Islamic religious fanaticism – and stop pretending that ideology has nothing to do with 9/11.

Tony Coren says:

Some years ago, not long after the 7/7 London tube bombings, I attended a Muslim city circle event in Central London where Tariq Ramadan was the speaker. He appeared to be promoting a soft deep Islam with a timeless transformative appeal beyond “savage” literalist textual interpretation. What he seemed to be saying was that below the Koranic surface text was a deeper more beautiful diamond of truth that could be applied to our new century. The audience was 90% Muslim and there were a few ignorant hothead shouty second generation British Muslim rude-boy types that one typically comes across at anti-war and Free Palestine rallies. He was patient with these guys but insisted they were mistaken. Ramadan (unusual name for a Muslim) came across as gentle and charming. This is pure impression and anecdotal as I have not read his books or articles. Either he is peaceful and sincere (the impression I got), or he is a dissimulator and practitioner of Islamic Takiya par excellence. Perhaps I should read some of his material and revisit this discussion in that light.

The vast majority of Sunnis deny the validity of taqiyya.

Yeux says:

> Tony Coren

That matches exactly my impression when I saw him speak at a conference in a French town.

Marooned says:

I have requested my local library to order Mr. Berman’s latest book, have read “Tablet’s” interview and have downloaded his “New Republic” article. So, I plead a real shallowness of knowledge and understanding of this specific.

However, without throwing “-ist” bomb words, we all should recall how many friendly-faces and -voices have misrepresented dangers in the past.

46. Thanks for another excellent article. Where else could anyone get that kind of information in such an ideal way of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.

[url=http://calivit.com]calivita[/url]

I am impressed, I have to say. I hardly ever uncover a weblog that’s both informative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you may have hit the nail on the head. Your post is essential; the matter is one thing that not many individuals are speaking intelligently about. I am very blissful that I stumbled throughout this in my search for one thing relating to it.

I’ve said that least 2189468 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

Wonderful work! This is the type of info that should be shared around the web. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my website . Thanks =)

Thank you for another fantastic article. Where else could anyone get that kind of information in like a perfect way of presentation.

Excellent blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Intellectual Jihad

‘Terror and Liberalism’ author Paul Berman on the State Department decision to allow Muslim intellectual Tariq Ramadan to visit the U.S.

More on Tablet:

A Zionist Porn Star, a Lube Merchant, and a Lesbian Rabbi Walk Into a Gay Synagogue…

By James Kirchick — Accepted by the mainstream Jewish community, some gays now feel excluded at New York’s premier LGBT synagogue