Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Did Biden Link Israel to the Troops’ Safety?

A polarizing meme is born

Print Email

In addition to the main debate over whether the Obama administration was correct to upbraid the Netanyahu government over the timing of its East Jerusalem construction announcement (and over the construction itself), a secondary dispute has emerged, whose implications may well come to trump the larger debate. They center around the following statement, reportedly made by Vice President Joe Biden to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week:

This is starting to get dangerous for us. What you’re doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. That endangers us and it endangers regional peace.

A senior administration official clarifies—for Tablet Magazine contributing editor Jeffrey Goldberg—that Biden does not believe that U.S. soldiers are put at direct risk by East Jerusalem building; he thinks, rather, that such construction makes it more difficult, from diplomatic and P.R. standpoint, for the U.S. military to achieve its objectives. “The extent to which Israel aggressively pursues peace,” the official said, makes efforts to sanction Iran, cultivate peace between Israel and its neighbors, and fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq “easier.”

It seems unlikely that Biden meant it literally; and it seems extremely unlikely that, taken literally, it’s accurate. But the meme that the special relationship with Israel is something of a problem for the United States, and particularly for the U.S. military, in fact has gained traction—particularly in the military.

And it is potentially explosive. If the debate over Israel travels from “what’s best for Israel” to “supporting the troops,” then it could become a real thing. Folks on one side could argue that getting tough with Israel’s government is a question not only of right versus wrong but of American national security; folks on the other side could argue that American supporters of Israel are being unfairly and inaccurately accused of a dual loyalty in a way that recalls classical, troubling charges about Jews everywhere.

Even when the Anti-Defamation League’s Abraham Foxman chastised Israel last week, he also insisted that Biden’s statement about the troops “unnecessarily called into question Israel’s role as an ally and the impact on American interests.” He expanded on this earlier today, condemning what he called the “linkage fantasy”—the notion that, “if you just resolve this conflict, everything else will fall into place: Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, America’s war with fundamentalist Islam.”’

As a prime example of the fantasy, Foxman cited a blogpost that appeared over the weekend at Foreign Policy, reporting that Gen. David Petraeus had requested that the Palestinian territories (though not Israel) be included under his purview, CENTCOM—which currently includes most of the Middle East and Central Asia, including both Iraq and Afghanistan. According to FP,

the briefers reported that there was a growing perception among Arab leaders that the U.S. was incapable of standing up to Israel, that CENTCOM’s mostly Arab constituency was losing faith in American promises, that Israeli intransigence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was jeopardizing U.S. standing in the region …

Petraeus’s reason was straightforward: with U.S. troops deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. military had to be perceived by Arab leaders as engaged in the region’s most troublesome conflict.

The Wall Street Journal reported something similar yesterday (although the following paragraphs have been scrubbed from the version that currently appears online):

The Pentagon has voiced growing concerns about the impact of the stalled Arab-Israeli peace process on broader U.S. security interests in the Middle East. Senior U.S. defense officials and military planners worry that the lack of progress is hindering American efforts to persuade oil-rich nations like Saudi Arabia to use their economic leverage over China to persuade Beijing to back tougher sanctions on Iran.

Gen. David Petraeus, the head of the military’s Central Command, sent a team to the Pentagon recently to brief members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Arab concerns about the impasse.

If the idea that U.S. support for Israel, combined with the current Israeli leadership’s beliefs and behavior, gains wider credence, then U.S. opinion about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will become unprecedentedly polarized.

Did Joe Biden Say What People Think He Said? [Jeffrey Goldberg]
Foxman: Don’t Blame The Jews [JPost]
The Petraeus Briefing: Biden’s Embarassment Is Not the Whole Story [Foreign Policy]

Print Email
Marc R says:

Biden used to criticize the linkage fantasy too:

Second, I’m concerned by reports suggesting that the Iraq Study Group will link a renewed effort to advance the Arab-Israeli peace process with a solution in Iraq. I am not opposed to a vigorous peace process — quite to the contrary, as I will explain in a moment. But the notion that an Israeli-Palestinian peace settlement would end a civil war in Iraq defies common sense. Israeli-Palestinian peace should be pursued aggressively on its own merits, period. Not as some sort of diplomatic price to make the Arab states feel good so they will help us in Iraq.

http://einshalom.com/archives/653

But that was then . . .

Carlos says:

Somebody should tell Joe about the large numbers of American Soldier’s lives save by the armor on their vehicles manufactured by Kibbutz Saasa.
Also I think that even Biden is smart enough to realize that none of the Arab countries actually care about the Palestinians. Jordan and Egypt swallowed the land set aside for the Palestinians in 1948 and no one said a word.

C.E.Donnelly says:

My understanding is that many countries in the region see Israel Palestine as a convenient vocal distraction from their internal political / economic issues – especially those places were there is a significant legacy refugee population. (Carlos says this well)

Let’s be clear – topic #1 on the mind of some Iraqi planting an IED is probably not East Jerusalem. And perhaps we could also say that the Taliban fighter has a greater stake in the street price of Heroin in Eastern Europe.

America is being goaded by the Arabs and Moslems. Nothing will ever satisfy them and they will not deal in an ethical manner the way most countries behave after a war. Schalit should have been returned to Israel. The Moslems only weaken America’s standing in the world. If Obama made progress in solving the Moslem problem.
I would think we had made some gains but the Koran is not equal to the Judeo-Christian world. It seeks to destroy our way of life.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Did Biden Link Israel to the Troops’ Safety?

A polarizing meme is born

More on Tablet:

The Ding-Dong Derby

By Liel Leibovitz — The Shallowest, Least Thoughtful Commentators of the Week