Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

In U-Turn, Beinart Slams Israel, AIPAC

Warns Zionism is increasingly for the Orthodox

Print Email

This is what we’ll be talking about all week. Prominent liberal journalist Peter Beinart has predicted that Zionism among young American Jews is increasingly the exclusive reserve of the insensitive, illiberal Orthodox. Moreover, he blames this trend on AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League, and the rest of the establishment. These organizations, by insisting on all-but-unquestioned support for Israel and its governments’ policies, have served, he argues, as “intellectual bodyguards for Israeli leaders who threaten the very liberal values they profess to admire.”

Here is the essay’s crux: “For several decades, the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door, and now, to their horror, they are finding that many young Jews have checked their Zionism instead.”

Beinart is one-time editor of the staunchly pro-Israel New Republic. He prominently supported the Iraq invasion and specifically chastised fellow Democrats who didn’t. He has since repudiated that support, but even so, it is not a little surprising to see a one-time genuine hawk calling Israeli “new historian” Tom Segev “fearless.” (Under his leadership TNR endorsed Joe Lieberman in the 2004 Democratic primaries. Joe Lieberman!)

And even that is not as jarring as Beinart’s choice of venue. The New York Review of Books is the premier outlet for essays that are critical of Zionism; it famously published Tony Judt’s repudiation of Zionism in 2003. Tellingly, this is Beinart’s first contribution to the journal. Among other things, Beinart’s decision is designed to reassure you that, no, you’re not misreading it, and, yes, his piece really does represent a genuine shift for him. It also means Beinart chose to trade a certain amount of credibility with those who disagree with his conclusions in exchange for solidarity with those who do. Not to be overly cynical, but Beinart’s new book is out in two weeks.

Beinart’s essay may not garner quite the controversy that Judt’s did, but older American Jewish liberals won’t enjoy being told that their strong support for Israel is illiberal. They will make some immediate counterpunches, and will also take issue with Beinart’s handling of the relevant research, which may not suggest a permanent generation gap on the question of Israel (more on this in a bit).

The left will applaud Beinart, although he remains a Zionist—there are no better prizes for them than once-hawkish Jewish apostates. Meanwhile, J Street may be a little afraid to embrace him, even though his critical, liberal Zionism seems like a good match. (Beinart conspicuously does not mention the “pro-Israel, pro-peace” group.)

The Orthodox? Well, they won’t be too happy, and few will blame them. (Beinart attends an Orthodox synagogue. Awkward!)

Quick prediction: The sentence that will attract the most ire is, “Not only does the organized American Jewish community mostly avoid public criticism of the Israeli government, it tries to prevent others from leveling such criticism as well.” It will be very easy for critics to mention Walt and Mearsheimer as an inspiration.

After the jump: A couple key paragraphs and the anticipated counter-arguments. I’ll round-up the responses in the afternoon, assuming any writers or bloggers decide to respond to Beinart’s essay. (That was a joke.)

Here are what we in the journalism business call the nut grafs:

Among American Jews today, there are a great many Zionists, especially in the Orthodox world, people deeply devoted to the State of Israel. And there are a great many liberals, especially in the secular Jewish world, people deeply devoted to human rights for all people, Palestinians included. But the two groups are increasingly distinct. Particularly in the younger generations, fewer and fewer American Jewish liberals are Zionists; fewer and fewer American Jewish Zionists are liberal. One reason is that the leading institutions of American Jewry have refused to foster—indeed, have actively opposed—a Zionism that challenges Israel’s behavior in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and toward its own Arab citizens. For several decades, the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door, and now, to their horror, they are finding that many young Jews have checked their Zionism instead.

Morally, American Zionism is in a downward spiral. If the leaders of groups like AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations do not change course, they will wake up one day to find a younger, Orthodox-dominated, Zionist leadership whose naked hostility to Arabs and Palestinians scares even them, and a mass of secular American Jews who range from apathetic to appalled. Saving liberal Zionism in the United States—so that American Jews can help save liberal Zionism in Israel—is the great American Jewish challenge of our age. And it starts where Luntz’s students wanted it to start: by talking frankly about Israel’s current government, by no longer averting our eyes.

So what will the rebuttals say?

• At the center of the essay is the contention that young American Jews feel less of an affinity to Israel than their elders, which is based on a couple cited reports. The essay’s critics will accuse Beinart of ignoring subsequent research that called those reports into question, and of abusing the reports’ conclusions. They will point to reports from past decades that suggest that young American Jews always feel less of an affinity for Israel—they grow into it.

• Beinart attacks those who undermine human rights organizations’ work uncovering alleged Israeli abuses. His caveat: “Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are not infallible.” Many will find that quite the understatement.

• Beinart’s allegation of Israeli illiberalism ignores the historical and geopolitical contexts in which Israel operates, his critics will say. The liberalism of the bien pensant American Jewish intellectual is a little easier to come by than the liberalism of the embattled Israeli prime minister. Of course, this is part of why the victimhood narrative is important.

• This technically has no bearing on the substance of the piece, but … Beinart has a new book coming out. It’s his first since 2006’s The Good Fight, which argued for muscular liberalism. I have not read his new book, but something called The Icarus Syndrome could only offer fuller regret for his one-time hawkishness. An essay such as this is just the sort of thing to both get attention generally and endear him to the left specifically.

• The choice of venue makes it all too easy for the right to pounce. So easy, in fact, that one must conclude that Beinart isn’t addressing this to the right: It is aimed primarily to energize the left and, in addition, to put the notion in the heads of those who espouse a critical Zionism that they may be running out of time.

• Many, many other things that I’m missing right now, but which I don’t doubt I’ll be reminded of as the day goes on.

The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment [NYRB]
Related: King Without a Crown [Tablet Magazine]

Print Email

I think you canvassed it about as well as you could have at this point, Marc.

Dave says:

It seems to me like you’re the EXPERT, Marc!

Jonathan Lopatin says:

I don’t thin it is being nitpicky to say that you head line “Beinart Slams Israel” is really a cheap shot. . He may have slammed much of American Jewish leadership viz-a-viz Israel but he didn’t “slam” Israel. That is precisely the point. In your zeal for a catchy headline, you seemed to have missed that. He obviously loves Israel very much.

esthermiriam says:

Well, sounds more like he is afraid to embrace J Street, although the generational issue is one that organization had long addressed and is acting on with its J Street U organizing.

Being halachically Orthodox does not and should not imply being a Zionist. Non-Zionist Orthodoxy (and I don’t mean Netura Karta) is a historically viable and legitimate category of affiliation that has been squeezed out by the current polarization. Judaism, after all, has been around a lot longer than nationalism.

George Barth says:

As long as the Israelis will not follow the newest PA-wish “to return to Europe and Ethiopia” (how about returning to
Morocco,Tunisia,Alger,Egypt,Iraq,Lebanon etc.?) Zionism will
in the eyes of the “Liberals” never be liberal enough. The liberal NGOs, financed by the EU and anti-Israeli elements in Scandinavia, are not just critics of the Jewish state, but open
adversaries. Suddenly are the heirs of Amin el-Husseini and Yasser Arafat the great Liberals, the heirs of Theodor Herzl and
Ben Gurion the reactionaries… What a joke !

Honest Broker says:

At some point Israel and the American Jewish establishment will wake to the fact that they blew it. The hope it is before it is too late.

Shalom Freedman says:

This article is based on a false distinction, between Zionists and liberals. The real distinction is between those who are actually informed about Middle East realities and ignoramuses like Peter Beinart. He has that typical presumption and arrogance of those who simply fail to know the history of the conflict deeply and the actual positions held now by the opponents. He fails to understand that the problem is not with Israel , most of whose citizens would compromise for peace, but with the Palestinans and their army of hate- filled supporters who have refused for over sixty years to live in peace with the Jewish state.

June Getraer says:

As a liberal and non affiliated Jew, I couldn’t agree more with the comments by Shalom Freedman. Study the history of the conflict, listen to the voices and official positions of the ennemy and face reality. It is not a perfect world. The solutions which present themselves can have many paths for the Palestinians but the wrong one could be the final solution for Israel!

I am a Zionist. But I come from the Labor Zionist tradition — a long-time liberal side. Where do I go to register?

K2K says:

At DailyBeast, Beinart rebuts Jonathan Chait’s post at TNR.com. Beinart makes it MUCH clearer in his DailyBeast post that he is mostly angry with Israel’s changing demographics and polity since the 1990′s. I infer from his Daily Beast post that his solution to Israel’s problems would require ethnic cleansing of 25% of Israel’s Jewish population in order to cleanse the Knesset of Yisrael Beitenu and Shas (how dare they win so many seats that they are part of a governing majority coalition!!!)
Beinart’s vision for regime change in Israel so that Tzipi Livni has a second chance at being the Prime Minister would require 1) sending 900,000 former-Soviet Union Jews back to mother Russia, starting with Avigdor Lieberman of Yisrael Beitenu, and 2) sending all Mizrahi and their descendants, the constituency of Shas, back to the Muslim countries that expelled them starting in 1948: Morocco, Libya, Iraq, Egypt, Syria….

Beinart should be ashamed of himself.

While I agree with the points in In U-Turn, Beinart Slams Israel, AIPAC – by Marc Tracy – Tablet Magazine – A New Read on Jewish Life , I think the positive sentiment around today is a concequence of a politically engineered set of circumstances. The demand for consumer credit is still weak and there is no improvement in the housing market. The developed countries are surviving on their politicians ability to just borrow and spend into their economies which is difficult to maintain. Regards, Lorna Sarkodie.

I really do love employing your enterprise. Your word wide web layout may be very easy around the eye. You use a great method to shop. I seriously enjoyed navigating and ordering out of your site. It may be very, very easy to use and simplified. Great job using a fabulous site.

I found your weblog web site on google and examine a number of of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the superb operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. In search of forward to studying extra from you afterward!

Words cannot express how much I loved Game of Thrones. The wait until next year will be painful (however, the new book should help).|dandirks|

Good web site! I truly love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well writtenI’m wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been madeI have subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a great day!

I’ve said that least 523935 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

I am not sure where you are getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent info I was looking for this info for my mission.

Trying to get one way to trim off fat in a hurry, get rid of a bit of excess weight, then shed 10 pounds in as few as a few days consequently read this web portal.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

In U-Turn, Beinart Slams Israel, AIPAC

Warns Zionism is increasingly for the Orthodox

More on Tablet:

Why Great Palestinian Victories Are Worse Than Defeats

By Edward N. Luttwak — Hamas today is in the same position as Yasser Arafat once was: sacrificing its people to a corrupted ideal