Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Soros Funding of J Street Revealed

Group had implied otherwise

Print Email
George Soros last month.(Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

It’s an inside baseball story—but it’s in our league. For the year between July 2008 and July 2009, the “pro-Israel, pro-peace” organization received roughly one-third of its revenue—some $245,000—from billionaire Jewish left-wing financier George Soros and family as part of a three-year, $750,000 gift. The news is relevant less because Soros, a prominent AIPAC critic, is controversial—he is controversial mainly to those who are not J Street fans anyway—and more because J Street head Jeremy Ben-Ami had repeatedly implied that Soros was not a donor. As Ben Smith notes, “The apparent cover-up is perhaps worse than the crime.”

Having Soros as a donor isn’t ideal politically—whether it should or shouldn’t be, it isn’t—and J Street has been notable for wanting to be an effective political actor, not just an emotionally satisfying outlet. “Our No. 1 agenda item is to do whatever we can in Congress to act as the president’s blocking back,” Ben-Ami told the New York Times Magazine. Taking Soros’s money, by itself, is manageable politically; appearing as though it was trying to hide it is a larger problem. (For one thing, I suspect this blocking back is about to be benched until at least after the midterms.) The point is, this screw-up should upset no one as much as J Street’s supporters.

Here is Ben-Ami’s explanation, which he offered only yesterday:

I accept responsibility personally for being less than clear about Mr. Soros’ support once he did become a donor. I said Mr. Soros did not help launch J Street or provide its initial funding, and that is true. I also said we would be happy to take his support. But I did not go the extra step to add that he did in fact start providing support in the fall of 2008, six months after our launch.

J Street’s commitment to Israel ought to be judged solely on its positions and actions. But it won’t be, and Jeremy Ben-Ami knows it won’t be, which strongly suggests that he made a conscious decision to hide the Soros connection. (In 2007, Soros wrote in the New York Review of Books, “AIPAC under its current leadership has clearly exceeded its mission, and far from guaranteeing Israel’s existence, has endangered it.”) Additionally, on its Website, J Street asked to be judged as an organization that had not taken Soros’s money (here is the essential reading).

Which leads to the real point: The group indisputably just lost a lot of credibility. Fair or not, fallacial critiques or not, when someone as high-profile and controversial as Soros gives you money—and when you accept it—you need to voluntarily disclose this, even if no one asks you about it. Moroever, given that people apparently did ask about it, only to be basically dismissed, why should we continue to believe J Street’s leadership about, well, anything? (Incidentally, reporter Eli Lake was able to access the relevant documents, which should have been private, due to an IRS error. But if J Street thought this would never come out, then which political/media system did it think it was operating in?)

Finally, Soros has a history of using his (substantial) political philanthrophy to advance his own agenda. Which does not prove that J Street went along with him in this instance; but it does add to the need for there to have been disclosure.

James Besser strikes the right note (while reminding us that there are several elections in November):

Why this is stupid: there’s no way this information wasn’t going to come out.

There’s no way this revelation, coming after two years of denials, will not be seen as confirmation in the minds of many that J Street is what its detractors say—a group that is something less than pro-Israel. The critics, it turns out, were right about Soros; isn’t that going to fan suspicion they were right about other things, as well?

There’s no way this isn’t going to make the politicians supported by J Street and those who may be considering accepting its endorsement incredibly nervous. Instead of providing protection for the politicians they supported, J Street essentially hung them out to dry—not by accepting Soros money, but by lying about their connection to the controversial philanthropist.

And there’s no way this doesn’t sow mistrust among commentators and reporters who write and speak about J Street, and who were repeatedly misled by its officials. J Street sought to create a climate of trust with a press corps that was being spun heavily by its opponents; this news undoes a lot of that effort.

Soros Revealed as Funder of of Liberal Jewish-American Lobby [Washington Times]
Explanation of George Soros & J Street Funding [J Street]
J Street in a Tough Spot Over Soros Funding Revelations [Political Insider]
J Street’s Half-Truths and Non-Truths About Its Funding [Atlantic]
Related: On Israel, America, and AIPAC [NYRB]

Print Email

Who says it isn’t politically ideal to have George Soros’ backing? Why voluntarily cede that to the right instead of recognizing that maybe, and with the invaluable help of people like Soros (though there really are no others like him,) the playing field is in fact changing? J Street and the rest of us should be openly proud to have Soros’ backing and eternally thankful to him.

Well, well, well, J Street has now been officially outed as another anti-Israel, anti-Democratic play thing for the morally corrupt Soros. Will that change Marc’s view of J Street, doubtful. But I think J Street should change its name to S Street.

eg

If you support the anti-liberal, anti-democratic groups Soros funds, then I guess he is your guy. But it is so sad that ‘liberal/progressives’ or whatever you want to call yourself these days are supported of tyrants around the world. People like yourself are so morally bankrupt its beyond sad.

Let’s see, as a PRO ISRAEL GROUP they have the backing of someone who told ’60 minutes’ he had NO GUILT over handing over jews to nazis in WW2 to get their property because it it was just market market dynamics, and that’s not a problem?

Delusion is a very powerful force, apparently.

No guilt. Just think about that.

rebscott says:

While I certainly agree that we don’t need to “voluntarily cede” anything to the right, it doesn’t change my deep and profound disappointment at the way that J Street and Jeremy Ben-Ami have mishandled this situation.

Clearly, this was a deeply flawed decision that will have profound and negative consequences for J Street. The attempt at spin and damage control only makes it worse.

I thought that J. Ben-Ami was smarter than this. I am very sorry to be proven wrong.

J street’s views are anti Israel, but its biggest danger is it gives political cover to politicians who promote policies that are detrimental to the Jewish state. Anything that exposes J Street for the fraud it is I view as a positive.

In the 6th paragraph, the term “rof” is used. Does anyone here know what this means?

Soros made his blood money by creating and supporting the suffering for others – during the Nazi occupation of Hungary and since then in his market manipulations. So now, J Street takes his blood money – and then hides it.

And who is the other big contributor to J St? An unknown corporation from Hong Kong. Very suspicious.

Eric Weis says:

Wow. I never knew how much of an ogre George Soros was. Not bad for a Hungarian Jewish kid, who at the age of 14, managed to survive the deportation of 500,000 of his co-religionists. If you were 14 – 15 years old in those circumstances, tell me that you would take the “high road” and put your life on the line DAILY.

J-Street obviously fumbled on this one. Soros should not be hidden. He deserves respect as a survivor of the Shoah.

Its not that he was a survivor, it is that Soros says he has no guilt about turning over his fellow Jews and confiscating their protperty during thw Shoah. He helped the Nazis murder his own people and feels no regret. That is the point, not that he did what he had to in order to survive. You need to get your story straight. Besides the fact that Soros is anti-democratic, anti-American, anti-capitalist, while playing the game and hoping to destroy nations’ economies, as he almost did to England.Soros is a sociopathic egocentric bully who sees nothing that he does as wrong or immoral.Why anyone who believes in true freedom would support him in any way shape or form confounds those of us who actually think.

Independent Patriot

Unfortunately, there are a lot of Jews who believe in anti-liberal and anti-democratic behavior Soros espouse himself in.

I found your blog’s link put up by a friend of mine on Facebook. Thank you for putting useful info on the web. It’s hard to get these things these days.

The subsequent time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I imply, I know it was my option to learn, however I truly thought youd have one thing fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could possibly repair if you werent too busy looking for attention.

Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too great. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is really a tremendous site.

Scottish Proverb~ Twelve highlanders and a bagpipe make a rebellion.

Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will definitely return.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Soros Funding of J Street Revealed

Group had implied otherwise

More on Tablet:

Remembering Margot Adler

By Sara Ivry — NPR anchor passes away at 68