Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Bibi Moderates on Loyalty Oath

New bill would require pledge of Jews, too

Print Email
Prime Minister Netanyahu.(Lior Mizrahi-Pool/Getty Images)

Prime Minister Netanyahu, who previously backed an amendment to Israel’s Citizenship Law that would have required non-Jewish prospective immigrants to pledge allegiance to a “Jewish and democratic state,” has now—after the cabinet already passed the prior version, which is favored by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman’s right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu party—submitted an amendment that would require the so-called “loyalty oath” of all prospective immigrants, including Jews. If those on the left are not fully satisfied with the change, they ought nonetheless appreciate its less illiberal nature.

Some, such as Tablet Magazine’s Liel Leibovitz (who yesterday polemicized against the oath) and the protestors who thronged Tel Aviv’s streets this past weekend will still say any oath at all is too much. And others, including Tablet Magazine Mideast columnist Lee Smith, will argue the oath is unremarkable, and restricting it to non-Jews follows the established, broadly observed principle of jus sanguinis. Actually, the group that most prominently advocated the compromise that Bibi has now adopted is the Anti-Defamation League, whose director, Abraham Foxman, met with Netanyahu yesterday in Israel.

But enough of the substance—what about the politics? When Netanyahu first backed the hardline version of the oath, I (and many others) guessed it was an effort to buy credibility with the right in order to extend the settlement freeze. It’s nearly two weeks later, though, and Netanyahu was able to do no more than futilely offer an extension in exchange for Palestinian recognition of Israel’s Jewish character. So: Is Bibi’s newfound willingness to make the oath more moderate a sign that bargaining with it is not worthwhile, because the extension is, officially, a lost cause?

Netanyahu Orders Change in Loyalty Oath To Include Jews [JPost]
Related: Under Oath
Earlier: What Did You Do in the Loyalty Oath War?
Bibi Floats Oath Quid for Freeze Quo

Print Email

In my view it was never anything more than a negotiating tactic that has now served its purpose:

a gesture to send 2 signals: first and foremost to the Palestinians and the American mediators that the issue of recognition of “The Jewish State” is not negotiating rhetoric, but a showstopper issue; and, second, to the Israeli Arab community that they can no longer play both ends of the stick — when there are 2 states, they become either minority citizens of Israel (with full civil rights) or citizens of Palestine, but not both.

Very interesting info!Perfect just what I was looking for!

I enjoy the items you put in here. Very relevant information. Consider yourself saved.

of course like your web site but you need to check the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I will certainly come back again.

You are a very smart person!

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Bibi Moderates on Loyalty Oath

New bill would require pledge of Jews, too

More on Tablet:

Elvis Was Our Shabbos Goy

By Vox Tablet — Some people lean on neighbors for a cup of sugar. The Fruchters, of Memphis, Tennessee, needed theirs to help them keep the Sabbath.