Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Israel-Lebanon Sea Border Dispute Heats Up

Lebanon’s line gives it a chunk of gas field, could also create conflict

Print Email
The disputed borders.(menas borders)

Last summer, Mideast columnist Lee Smith predicted that the Leviathan natural gas field, newly discovered off Israel’s northern coast, might spark the long-dreaded) sequel to the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah conflict. Since then, Lebanon passed a provocative oil law and Hezbollah only gained power, and yet the debate over whether Lebanese maritime jurisdiction includes parts of Leviathan—thought to hold tens of billions of dollars in energy—has largely taken place quietly through a U.S. mediator. That is, until the past few days. Amid growing rhetoric from both sides, on Sunday Israel’s cabinet approved a proposed border that it plans to submit to the United Nations. That border gives it larger maritime jurisdiction than Lebanon’s proposed border, which it submitted to the U.N. a few months ago. Lebanon’s energy minister labeled Israel’s move an act of “aggression,” and added, “Lebanon will not abandon its maritime border.”

Actually, though, to my admittedly untrained eye, it seems as though Lebanon already did (for a detailed discussion of the maritime borders, see here). The Times reports that Lebanon’s proposed line conflicts both with a line that Israel and Cyprus have agreed to as well as indeed with a line (also with Cyprus) that Lebanon itself agreed to in 2007—you know, before everyone knew there was gaseous gold under the sea. “We signed an agreement with Cyprus that is in keeping with its agreement with Lebanon,” explained Israeli minister of strategic affairs Moshe Ya’alon. “They decided to sketch a new border south of the line that was agreed to in talks between Lebanon and Cyprus, and basically entered our territory. It was done with premeditation in order to create conflict with us, just like the Sheba Farms.”

Well, hopefully it was done because Lebanon just wanted a piece of the natural gas pie, and if giving them said piece, however much it may rightfully belong to Israel, satisfied it, then a pragmatic supporter of Israel would feel inclined to see it as a small price to pay to forestall war. The problem is that Lebanon is not run by Lebanon, but rather by the Iranian proxy Hezbollah. Maybe it wants its border so that it can get in on the natural gas; but maybe it also wants, as Ya’alon suggests, to create a border dispute that can serve as a pretext for a war that Iran wants anyway.

Rival Claims to Sea Territory Made by Israel and Lebanon [NYT]
Lebanon Accuses Israel of ‘Aggression’ in Its Proposed Sea Boundary Near Huge Gas Fields [AP/WP]
Lebanon: We Won’t Forfeit Maritime Rights [Ynet]
Related: The Next Lebanon War [Tablet Magazine]
Earlier: Lebanon Passes Oil Law

Print Email
jacob arnon says:

That an Arab country would accuse Israel of aggression is not exactly news.

In this case, Lebanon backed by Syria through Hezbollah is just trying to create tensions to distract from the internal problems in Syria.

“In this case, Lebanon backed by Syria through Hezbollah is just trying to create tensions to distract from the internal problems in Syria.”

More accurately, this is Hezbollah (Shi’ite) backed by Iran (shi’ite).

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Israel-Lebanon Sea Border Dispute Heats Up

Lebanon’s line gives it a chunk of gas field, could also create conflict

More on Tablet:

Poland’s Jewish Festival Circuit is Extensive

By Stephanie Butnick — There were more than 40 events this year celebrating Jewish culture