Tablet Magazine - a new read on Jewish life
Big Tech Dispatch from The Scroll
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Google in a Virginia federal court on Tuesday in an effort to break up the tech giant’s domination of the digital advertising market. Along with seeking damages, federal prosecutors aim to force Google to sell its Ad Manager program because it allows Google to exercise an unfair advantage in the marketplace it controls, giving its own products better ad placement, among other abuses. In 2021, Ad Manager accounted for 12% of the company’s revenue. The analogy would be “if Goldman or Citibank owned the NYSE,” said an unnamed Google executive quoted in the complaint.
On an entirely unrelated note, former Speaker of the House and all-around market whiz Nancy Pelosi dumped her 30,000 shares of Google in December, just weeks before the Justice Department filed its suit.
Big Tech Dispatch from The Scroll
“The fines against Meta for privacy violations are seemingly endless, though so far the company has been able to afford them by dipping into its massive cash reserves—in fact, Meta set aside $3 billion for E.U. privacy fines in 2022-23. In the last year alone, Meta paid the European Union $785 million in privacy-related fines, including more than $400 million for Instagram violations of children’s privacy.”
Read more about it in The Scroll, Tablet’s free afternoon newsletter.
Journal of a Plague


Norman Doidge, the pioneering author of two ground-breaking books about neuroscience—The Brain that Changes Itself and The Brain’s Way of Healing, as well as a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst with a background in poetry, has been keeping a journal of sorts about the pandemic. In these illuminating dispatches, ruminations, and essays, Doidge connects what we learn about the virus to what we already know about human development and evolution and ponders potential lessons for us individually, communally, and as a society.
Click through to the right to find all of Doidge’s previous journal entries in chronological order.


We have been here before.
Many times, in fact, as a species. Each of us has something, deep within us, that “knows” or “senses” this. Epidemics are part of our history and, as archeological evidence shows, of our “prehistory” before written records existed. That they have had such an impact on humanity also means that adaptations to parasites and pathogens are a major part of our biological inheritance—or, to use the reductionist shorthand, “are part of our DNA.”


Most people assume that it is the virus—and the policies and practices we are being advised or compelled to follow now, such as the cleaning protocols, shutting of the borders, shutting ourselves in, and so on—that is driving what is going on in our brains, which are just reacting to these events. But actually, it is, more than one might think, the other way around. The “knowledge” and “action plans” inherent in our biological pandemic suite are the foundation of our public health techniques, and even some of our more advanced medical approaches to dealing with the pandemic. What public health has learned in the last hundred years is in fact a relearning, in large part, tested and retested through evolutionary trial and error over vast time scales.


Even though the behavioral immune system, at a conscious level,helps us to recognize potential threats, it is not a purely conscious system, divorced from our deeper biology. Indeed, it can have a profound effect on our cellular, and bodily state. A recent study by Schaller and colleagues showed subjects pictures of diseased people, then measured their immune response, and found just seeing disease imaged actually triggers an aggressive white blood cell response.
In other words, the BIS is, as it were, braided into our being, from cell to psyche, from the literal braids of our DNA, up through to the tangled extensions of neuron cell bodies and axons that make our brain circuits, and it is braided into our mental lives.


Once the behavioral immune system is firing in a population, the very thought of an alternative to it that involves people getting infected, becomes taboo. Whoever argues for it risks being treated like an infectious agent, and being ostracized. (Please don’t ostracize me, dear reader, for saying so! I’m not here making an argument for, or against. I’m trying to describe how, once we accept the logic of lockdown, our thoughts about how to get out of it become paralyzed by our protective instincts.)
It’s fascinating that even trying to think through the idea of a herd immunity strategy can arouse terror and rage in us—even though, we might be well aware, in the very same instant, that lockdown is not a sustainable strategy because of the total harm it does, not only to the economy, but to health, mortality (increases in untreated cancers, missed cancer diagnoses, strokes, heart attacks, suicide, appendicitis attacks, drug addiction, murder secondary to domestic abuse, etc.).


This is the confusing moment we find ourselves in. The very phrase, “science says,” invoked over and over by our politicians and public health officials, implies consistency, and it implies that science races ahead of the rest of us and has already answered the questions we now have and already solved the problem we only just realized we had. It implies that science speaks in a univocal way, as though it were a single person. Univocality assumes there is a reasoned consensus, overwhelming agreement, and “the science is settled.”
“Science says, ‘do this’” are the four most reassuring words in the English language.
Until science says, “do that.”


Plague as Punishment.
Examining one’s actions after a political catastrophe, in which there is often a human hand in the matter, makes sense. But blaming ourselves for plagues, famine, and drought, does, for someone living in the shadow of science, seem to take human responsibility rather far. It seems to partake of that egocentric frame of mind that characterizes the psyche in its earliest stages of evolution, or at its most primitive: The world revolves around us; the physical forces of the universe are woven into our lives, and if lightning strikes us, it is not random, it’s personal. If rain comes after long absence, it is because we are blessed; if a plague comes, it is because we are cursed. That seems so archaic.
So, why do we still do it?
Khaled Talaat on What We Know—and Don’t
Throughout 2020, the media reported a ‘scientific consensus’ about the pandemic’s origins without providing any information about its investigations
A scientist looks at why so few countries have acquired nukes since the Trinity test that heralded the Atomic Age—and how that could change
Will Fast, Cheap, and Plentiful Energy Be a Legacy of Los Alamos?
The atomic bombing over Japan marked the beginning of an era we are only now fully coming into
Dismissing the possibility that COVID-19 escaped from a lab in China as ‘a conspiracy theory’ is bad science
The Origin of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan
We don’t know yet. But contrary to recent reporting, science does not rule out a lab accident or even bioterrorism.
We read the internet all day so you don’t have to.
A newsletter so smart, it smarts, edited by Jacob Siegel
Sign up for Tablet’s afternoon news digest
Newsletter
The only magazine with Science and Belief sections. Sign up to get Tablet’s newsletter each morning:
Needle Points By Norman Doidge: Chapters I-IV
The unexpected occurs
The kernel brilliance of vaccines
A new plague descends
Getting out
To download a free, printer-friendly version of the complete article, click here.